Last week, I posed the
question, “will the IBL process alone be enough to motivate the unmotivated?” In
the back of my mind, I worry about providing lessons that are engaging. This
week, I learned how to incorporate Web 2.0 applications into the IBL process to
help engage students.
I still wonder. Will
inquiry-based lessons be enough to motivate and engage learners with technology
added into the mix? I have never agreed with using technology for just the sake
of using it. I know my students come into the classroom having had more access
to technology than I ever have and with a much shorter learning curve. They
also have a different mindset about technology than I do. I see it as a tool to
become more productive in society whereas they may only view it as
entertainment.
What Web 2.0 applications
do, in my opinion, is provide alternatives and opportunities to the teacher and
the student. I know I must attempt to reach all of my students, even those who
are far better at using technology than I. Web 2.0 allows me to better equip
myself for the 21st Century learner. The content I teach will
primarily be the same, but the learner will be different as well as the tools and
the processes I use to reach him.
I guess moderation is the
best way of approaching how to best use technology. I must make sure that
students first understand the process of inquiry and the scientific process
before adding another feature. I also think that if a student is truly
interested in the topic, technology will neither enhance, nor detract, from
their learning. Allowing students to choose what they want to investigate is
key in this process.
This brings another
question to mind about IBL. How much choice can you give them without sacrificing
the integrity of the lesson?
No comments:
Post a Comment